Derek


1h 16m 2008

Brief Synopsis

A cinematic journey that illuminates the work and enduring importance of the late director Derek Jarman.

Film Details

MPAA Rating
Genre
Documentary
Biography
Release Date
2008
Production Company
The Film Sales Company; The Film Sales Company
Distribution Company
Kino Video; Salzgeber & Co. Medien Gmbh

Technical Specs

Duration
1h 16m

Synopsis

About the life and work of the late British filmmaker Derek Jarman whose wholly original feature films re-imagined narrative while helping to establish a canon for Queer Cinema.

Film Details

MPAA Rating
Genre
Documentary
Biography
Release Date
2008
Production Company
The Film Sales Company; The Film Sales Company
Distribution Company
Kino Video; Salzgeber & Co. Medien Gmbh

Technical Specs

Duration
1h 16m

Articles

Derek


From today's perspective, it seems remarkable that there once was a filmmaker like Derek Jarman, and that there was a time - not the crazy, New Wavey '60s, but the Thatcherite '80s and early '90s - that allowed him to thrive and regularly found room in its international movie theaters for his films. It was a heady time, certainly, when British filmmakers, emboldened by punk culture, fueled by hatred for Thatcherism in all its forms, and funded by the BFI and the new Channel Four, could make experimental, high culture-vs.-low culture-collision movies, doped on structuralism and gender-bending and period-picture mockery. This was the era of Peter Greenaway, Terence Davies, Alex Cox, Neil Jordan, Bruce Robinson, Julian Temple, emigres Stephen and Timothy Quay, Patrick Keiller, Sally Potter, Isaac Julien, the renascent emergences of Mike Leigh and Ken Loach, and so on, planting British cinema tempestuously, raucously, back on the world cinema map after years of dire blandness. With a unique, confrontational, celebratorily gay, overtly avant-garde sensibility, Jarman was the moment's jester prince; he never made a film you'd mistake for the work of another artist, or a film that doesn't manifest on the screen as an unpredictably impish riff on serious matters, Art-making and Sex and Death.

Not to mention, Jarman was instrumental in giving gay cinema a chance to be regarded as pioneering art, not just politics, and to evolve into what became known as the New Queer Cinema. Dead in 1994 from AIDS at the age of 52, Jarman was immediately a sadly missed rogue element in contemporary culture, and so Julien's 2008 portrait doc of Jarman, Derek, has the furrowed angst of a requiem. Its emotionalism carries over to form - there are no talking heads (besides Jarman himself), no titles accompanying the film clips, no documented historicization. Only Jarman's reminiscences and Tilda Swinton's ruminative narration provide context; even so, the story is straight-forward, recounting Jarman's youth in Hampshire, his art-school development, and his maturation as a well-traveled artiste in the company of and before the work of everyone from Andy Warhol to David Hockney to Kenneth Anger.

Jarman, it turns out to our good fortune, is a buoyant and brisk raconteur, and the extensive interview sequences Julien and Bernard Rose filmed are full of Brit bonhomie and fastidious recollection. It's a classic if familiar misfit-kid-discovers-himself tale, but what's more interesting, to both Julien and Jarman, is the historical context in which he emerged, and the aesthetic inspirations along the way. Jarman's arsenal of tools was various but distinctive: voguing tableaux, camp ballet, cabaret shtick, poeticized narration, post-Genet softcore iconicity, satiric anachronism, found footage, classical texts, etc. (Add in a tireless fascination with angels, years before Tony Kushner saw AIDS in an angelic light.) But his style, always meta-, freely mutated from film to film. Caravaggio (1986) put him on the map, and in addition to fulfilling the threadbare-erotic promise of Sebastiane (1976), it divided and conquered its relationship with classical culture. Jarman simultaneously reproduced the Italian master's imagery and lighting dynamics (this was done so adroitly it was in turn slavishly co-opted by Tarsem Singh in his famous video for R.E.M.'s "Losing My Religion"), but also insisted on a caricatured, theatrical distance when it came to character and biography, framing art history not as a matter of a lofty past, but of a chaotic, exuberant, aroused now. His actors -- Nigel Terry, Tilda Swinton, Dexter Fletcher, Sean Bean -- gesticulate and fume and pose like street performers, and the artificiality of every aspect of the film repercusses around the contrived fauxness of all art. (Hardly anything is lent as much time and patience as the boredom and personality of Caravaggio's models.) Applying a pregnant wit that has escaped both Greenaway and Potter, two filmmakers treading around in roughly the same broad cultural arena, Jarman makes a pastiche out of the artist biopic, while at the same time revealing the process of making art as tangible and as just one factor in an artist's stormy, sexual, emotional life.

Jarman's work ranged from Wittgenstein (1993), which characterized the titular philosopher and the "art" of philosophy in general as cartoonish vaudeville farce, complete with blackened stage background and dialogue with Bertrand Russell, John Maynard Keynes and a green-skinned dwarf Martian, to The Last of England (1988), a fierce and bitter collage film condemning the state of the nation , to, finally, Blue (1993). Jarman's terminal work, Blue is famously not quite a movie at all, but a complex narration and soundtrack playing behind (beside? atop?) an empty but bright blue screen. Jarman's text, about the decay of his body and eyesight in the grip of AIDS, and about his closing life already emptied of friends and lovers, is wry and intimate, and its relationship with what you're seeing -- and not seeing -- is, to say the least, disquieting.

Julien's documentary honors Jarman mostly by letting the artist speak for himself, and letting his work stand without comment. (Swinton's self-dramatized wanderings around London are less eloquent.) It is no replacement for experiencing Jarman's brazen films on their own, of course, but rather the kind of high-octane DVD-supplement-ish portrait every great filmmaker deserves, and only occasionally get.

Producer: Colin MacCabe, Eliza Mellor
Director: Isaac Julien
Interviews: Bernard Rose
Cinematography: Nina Kellgren
Editing: Adam Finch
Music: Simon Fisher-Turner
Cast: Tilda Swinton (Narrator), Derek Jarman (archival footage), Isaac Julien (himself).
C-76m.

by Michael Atkinson
Derek

Derek

From today's perspective, it seems remarkable that there once was a filmmaker like Derek Jarman, and that there was a time - not the crazy, New Wavey '60s, but the Thatcherite '80s and early '90s - that allowed him to thrive and regularly found room in its international movie theaters for his films. It was a heady time, certainly, when British filmmakers, emboldened by punk culture, fueled by hatred for Thatcherism in all its forms, and funded by the BFI and the new Channel Four, could make experimental, high culture-vs.-low culture-collision movies, doped on structuralism and gender-bending and period-picture mockery. This was the era of Peter Greenaway, Terence Davies, Alex Cox, Neil Jordan, Bruce Robinson, Julian Temple, emigres Stephen and Timothy Quay, Patrick Keiller, Sally Potter, Isaac Julien, the renascent emergences of Mike Leigh and Ken Loach, and so on, planting British cinema tempestuously, raucously, back on the world cinema map after years of dire blandness. With a unique, confrontational, celebratorily gay, overtly avant-garde sensibility, Jarman was the moment's jester prince; he never made a film you'd mistake for the work of another artist, or a film that doesn't manifest on the screen as an unpredictably impish riff on serious matters, Art-making and Sex and Death. Not to mention, Jarman was instrumental in giving gay cinema a chance to be regarded as pioneering art, not just politics, and to evolve into what became known as the New Queer Cinema. Dead in 1994 from AIDS at the age of 52, Jarman was immediately a sadly missed rogue element in contemporary culture, and so Julien's 2008 portrait doc of Jarman, Derek, has the furrowed angst of a requiem. Its emotionalism carries over to form - there are no talking heads (besides Jarman himself), no titles accompanying the film clips, no documented historicization. Only Jarman's reminiscences and Tilda Swinton's ruminative narration provide context; even so, the story is straight-forward, recounting Jarman's youth in Hampshire, his art-school development, and his maturation as a well-traveled artiste in the company of and before the work of everyone from Andy Warhol to David Hockney to Kenneth Anger. Jarman, it turns out to our good fortune, is a buoyant and brisk raconteur, and the extensive interview sequences Julien and Bernard Rose filmed are full of Brit bonhomie and fastidious recollection. It's a classic if familiar misfit-kid-discovers-himself tale, but what's more interesting, to both Julien and Jarman, is the historical context in which he emerged, and the aesthetic inspirations along the way. Jarman's arsenal of tools was various but distinctive: voguing tableaux, camp ballet, cabaret shtick, poeticized narration, post-Genet softcore iconicity, satiric anachronism, found footage, classical texts, etc. (Add in a tireless fascination with angels, years before Tony Kushner saw AIDS in an angelic light.) But his style, always meta-, freely mutated from film to film. Caravaggio (1986) put him on the map, and in addition to fulfilling the threadbare-erotic promise of Sebastiane (1976), it divided and conquered its relationship with classical culture. Jarman simultaneously reproduced the Italian master's imagery and lighting dynamics (this was done so adroitly it was in turn slavishly co-opted by Tarsem Singh in his famous video for R.E.M.'s "Losing My Religion"), but also insisted on a caricatured, theatrical distance when it came to character and biography, framing art history not as a matter of a lofty past, but of a chaotic, exuberant, aroused now. His actors -- Nigel Terry, Tilda Swinton, Dexter Fletcher, Sean Bean -- gesticulate and fume and pose like street performers, and the artificiality of every aspect of the film repercusses around the contrived fauxness of all art. (Hardly anything is lent as much time and patience as the boredom and personality of Caravaggio's models.) Applying a pregnant wit that has escaped both Greenaway and Potter, two filmmakers treading around in roughly the same broad cultural arena, Jarman makes a pastiche out of the artist biopic, while at the same time revealing the process of making art as tangible and as just one factor in an artist's stormy, sexual, emotional life. Jarman's work ranged from Wittgenstein (1993), which characterized the titular philosopher and the "art" of philosophy in general as cartoonish vaudeville farce, complete with blackened stage background and dialogue with Bertrand Russell, John Maynard Keynes and a green-skinned dwarf Martian, to The Last of England (1988), a fierce and bitter collage film condemning the state of the nation , to, finally, Blue (1993). Jarman's terminal work, Blue is famously not quite a movie at all, but a complex narration and soundtrack playing behind (beside? atop?) an empty but bright blue screen. Jarman's text, about the decay of his body and eyesight in the grip of AIDS, and about his closing life already emptied of friends and lovers, is wry and intimate, and its relationship with what you're seeing -- and not seeing -- is, to say the least, disquieting. Julien's documentary honors Jarman mostly by letting the artist speak for himself, and letting his work stand without comment. (Swinton's self-dramatized wanderings around London are less eloquent.) It is no replacement for experiencing Jarman's brazen films on their own, of course, but rather the kind of high-octane DVD-supplement-ish portrait every great filmmaker deserves, and only occasionally get. Producer: Colin MacCabe, Eliza Mellor Director: Isaac Julien Interviews: Bernard Rose Cinematography: Nina Kellgren Editing: Adam Finch Music: Simon Fisher-Turner Cast: Tilda Swinton (Narrator), Derek Jarman (archival footage), Isaac Julien (himself). C-76m. by Michael Atkinson

Tilda Swinton Narrates Isaac Julien's 2008 Documentary on Derek Jarman


Derek (2008), written, narrated -- and driven -- by Tilda Swinton and directed by Isaac Julien, is a labor of love in which love overrides labor. If one's confrontation of one's own death is the ultimate measure of grace and style, Derek Jarman (1942-1994) was more than England's foremost queer cinema icon, gay activist and anti-Thatcherite point man. He was an impressive free spirit who even at the end, when blind and dying of AIDS, gave the impression of mustering, with no fuss at all, astonishingly buoyant, ethereal charm and wit. At one point during the copious interview footage with him, when asked what he would like to leave behind of himself and his work, he smiles and says, with the blunt simplicity of a man reconciled to slipping the moorings, "I want to evaporate."

Because Jarman was so fiercely a man of his time, he had already taken on something of a time-capsule aspect, bridging the political and the punk poles of anti-Thatcherism. But this film's admiring tenacity will keep him from fading into yesteryear as swiftly as he might otherwise have. One of Britain's first high-profile figures to openly declare his HIV-positive status, he took care not to allow the fight for gay rights to become folded into the larger spectrum of political protest. Superficial comparisons have been made between Jarman and Andy Warhol, partly because Jarman's Arthouse collective seemed an analogue to Warhol's Factory. But it won't do to push them too far. Warhol was enervated emptiness. Jarman was all cutting-edge urgency.

Warhol cultivated passivity, was about externals. Jarman and those around him went deeper. It was possible to be a Factory denizen and not actually do anything much beyond strike poses and hope you looked cool doing it. Jarman the art student veered away from art when he says he realized quite quickly that he was average, which wasn't, of course, good enough. He arrived just in time to be bowled over by La Dolce Vita (1960) and Scorpio Rising (1964). After sojourns in New York City and California, he returned to London, met David Hockney and Ken Russell, and never looked back. He wound up building sets for Russell's The Devils (1971). By the time he began shooting his own films focusing on gay life, in Super 8 and in poverty, he says he was convinced there was no connection between his world and the Ken Russell world.

Eventually, there was, sort of. And not just in Jarman's wicked reworking of Russell's film in his own The Devils at the Elgin (1974). Both were caught up in the sort of evocative, associative juxtapositions of images in non-linear narrative thrusts that critics, at a loss to better describe, loosely called psychedelic. Jarman's were more focused though, and stronger. It's in the films that comparisons between Jarman and Warhol break down utterly. Warhol was a slick illustrator whose genius may have been in his ability to keep silent, masking the fact that he had nothing to say while being deemed inscrutable. In a time when art blatantly became a commodity, an investment vehicle for nouveau riche collectors seeking kinds of social cachet unavailable from, say, futures in gold or pork bellies, Warhol maxed out the link between art and manufactured commodity. Jarman and his set had things to say, and said them intensely, if not always coherently. In purpose and energy levels, they're polar opposites.

Jarman made dozens of films, many with homoerotic agendas. Derek includes clips from 17 of them, and they frankly suffer a bit from being too scattershot and uncontextualized. Sebastiane (1976), shot mostly in Sardinia, put him on the map. Those arrows in the side of the saint-to-be advanced a sado-masochistic element that repeatedly surfaced, most notably in Edward II (1991), in which Jarman's reworking of Marlowe's dark medieval world included a then notorious red-hot poker scene. Like Jarman's Caravaggi (1986), it's an esthetic crossroads where sexuality and criminality intersect. Jubilee (1978) is an exuberant goulash of punk mischief, anti-royalist and, by not too far an extension, anti-Thatcherite, although not as effective or as esthetically ambitious as his outrage-filled bull's eye, The Last of England (1988). (Outrage, not so much a play on words as a rapier-like literal use of them, was the collective banner under which he staged and participated in many a political demonstration.) His lament for what he saw as the death of much he loved about his country continued in War Requiem (1989), in which he streamed evocative imagery against Benjamin Britten's masterpiece, itself inspired by the impassioned pacifism of Wilfred Owen's WWI battlefield poetry. Jarman's own requiem for his dying self, Blue (1993), is a heartbreaking leave-taking, with his voice and Swinton's evoking keening poetic images against a blue screen.

Given his themes, Jarman's films could easily have stayed at the level of illustrated placards. But his imagery was subtle and imaginative and, it hardly seems necessary to add, advanced independent filmmaking in England and elsewhere. Through so many of his more memorable ones strides Tilden, a tall, latter-day Scottish Joan of Arc, with her flaming red hair and fierce eyes dispelling the glamour that seems so ready to attach itself to her swanny bearing. Part of the bond between them may have been their discovery that each came from a military family. Swinton has said she regards herself as a soldier. One can believe it. Her conviction is so unquestionably, ferociously sincere that she can get away with writing and speaking likes like, "The formula merchants are out in force," making us forget her Oscar and her appearance on international best-dressed lists. Here, dressed down, she is seen, punctuating the film clips, marching through London with a restlessness akin to Jarman's, lamenting the loss of the purity of intention he brought to his work. And which she has brought to hers. Hauntingly, she suggests a soul searching against gray skies for someone and something precious she lost. When she was on art's barricades, Swinton wasn't kidding. You could do a lot worse in the muse department.

For more information about Derek, visit Kino International. To order Derek, go to TCM Shopping.

by Jay Carr

Tilda Swinton Narrates Isaac Julien's 2008 Documentary on Derek Jarman

Derek (2008), written, narrated -- and driven -- by Tilda Swinton and directed by Isaac Julien, is a labor of love in which love overrides labor. If one's confrontation of one's own death is the ultimate measure of grace and style, Derek Jarman (1942-1994) was more than England's foremost queer cinema icon, gay activist and anti-Thatcherite point man. He was an impressive free spirit who even at the end, when blind and dying of AIDS, gave the impression of mustering, with no fuss at all, astonishingly buoyant, ethereal charm and wit. At one point during the copious interview footage with him, when asked what he would like to leave behind of himself and his work, he smiles and says, with the blunt simplicity of a man reconciled to slipping the moorings, "I want to evaporate." Because Jarman was so fiercely a man of his time, he had already taken on something of a time-capsule aspect, bridging the political and the punk poles of anti-Thatcherism. But this film's admiring tenacity will keep him from fading into yesteryear as swiftly as he might otherwise have. One of Britain's first high-profile figures to openly declare his HIV-positive status, he took care not to allow the fight for gay rights to become folded into the larger spectrum of political protest. Superficial comparisons have been made between Jarman and Andy Warhol, partly because Jarman's Arthouse collective seemed an analogue to Warhol's Factory. But it won't do to push them too far. Warhol was enervated emptiness. Jarman was all cutting-edge urgency. Warhol cultivated passivity, was about externals. Jarman and those around him went deeper. It was possible to be a Factory denizen and not actually do anything much beyond strike poses and hope you looked cool doing it. Jarman the art student veered away from art when he says he realized quite quickly that he was average, which wasn't, of course, good enough. He arrived just in time to be bowled over by La Dolce Vita (1960) and Scorpio Rising (1964). After sojourns in New York City and California, he returned to London, met David Hockney and Ken Russell, and never looked back. He wound up building sets for Russell's The Devils (1971). By the time he began shooting his own films focusing on gay life, in Super 8 and in poverty, he says he was convinced there was no connection between his world and the Ken Russell world. Eventually, there was, sort of. And not just in Jarman's wicked reworking of Russell's film in his own The Devils at the Elgin (1974). Both were caught up in the sort of evocative, associative juxtapositions of images in non-linear narrative thrusts that critics, at a loss to better describe, loosely called psychedelic. Jarman's were more focused though, and stronger. It's in the films that comparisons between Jarman and Warhol break down utterly. Warhol was a slick illustrator whose genius may have been in his ability to keep silent, masking the fact that he had nothing to say while being deemed inscrutable. In a time when art blatantly became a commodity, an investment vehicle for nouveau riche collectors seeking kinds of social cachet unavailable from, say, futures in gold or pork bellies, Warhol maxed out the link between art and manufactured commodity. Jarman and his set had things to say, and said them intensely, if not always coherently. In purpose and energy levels, they're polar opposites. Jarman made dozens of films, many with homoerotic agendas. Derek includes clips from 17 of them, and they frankly suffer a bit from being too scattershot and uncontextualized. Sebastiane (1976), shot mostly in Sardinia, put him on the map. Those arrows in the side of the saint-to-be advanced a sado-masochistic element that repeatedly surfaced, most notably in Edward II (1991), in which Jarman's reworking of Marlowe's dark medieval world included a then notorious red-hot poker scene. Like Jarman's Caravaggi (1986), it's an esthetic crossroads where sexuality and criminality intersect. Jubilee (1978) is an exuberant goulash of punk mischief, anti-royalist and, by not too far an extension, anti-Thatcherite, although not as effective or as esthetically ambitious as his outrage-filled bull's eye, The Last of England (1988). (Outrage, not so much a play on words as a rapier-like literal use of them, was the collective banner under which he staged and participated in many a political demonstration.) His lament for what he saw as the death of much he loved about his country continued in War Requiem (1989), in which he streamed evocative imagery against Benjamin Britten's masterpiece, itself inspired by the impassioned pacifism of Wilfred Owen's WWI battlefield poetry. Jarman's own requiem for his dying self, Blue (1993), is a heartbreaking leave-taking, with his voice and Swinton's evoking keening poetic images against a blue screen. Given his themes, Jarman's films could easily have stayed at the level of illustrated placards. But his imagery was subtle and imaginative and, it hardly seems necessary to add, advanced independent filmmaking in England and elsewhere. Through so many of his more memorable ones strides Tilden, a tall, latter-day Scottish Joan of Arc, with her flaming red hair and fierce eyes dispelling the glamour that seems so ready to attach itself to her swanny bearing. Part of the bond between them may have been their discovery that each came from a military family. Swinton has said she regards herself as a soldier. One can believe it. Her conviction is so unquestionably, ferociously sincere that she can get away with writing and speaking likes like, "The formula merchants are out in force," making us forget her Oscar and her appearance on international best-dressed lists. Here, dressed down, she is seen, punctuating the film clips, marching through London with a restlessness akin to Jarman's, lamenting the loss of the purity of intention he brought to his work. And which she has brought to hers. Hauntingly, she suggests a soul searching against gray skies for someone and something precious she lost. When she was on art's barricades, Swinton wasn't kidding. You could do a lot worse in the muse department. For more information about Derek, visit Kino International. To order Derek, go to TCM Shopping. by Jay Carr

Quotes

Trivia

Miscellaneous Notes

Winner of the Documentary Competition Grand Jury Prize at the 2008 Seattle International Film Festival.

Released in United States 2008

Released in United States February 2008

Released in United States January 2008

Released in United States July 2008

Released in United States June 2008

Released in United States on Video September 2, 2008

Released in United States Summer June 9, 2008

Shown at Berlin International Film Festival (Panorama Dokumente) February 7-17, 2008.

Shown at Los Angeles Film Festival (Tribute, Anniversary, and Special Screenings) June 19-29, 2008.

Shown at Outfest: Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Film Festival (Documentary Features) July 9-21, 2008.

Shown at San Francisco International Lesbian and Gay Film Festival (Showcase) June 19-29, 2008.

Shown at Seattle International Film Festival (Documentary Competition/Documentary Films) May 22-June 15, 2008.

The Film Sales Company acquired worldwide sales and domestic rights at the 2008 Sundance Film Festival.

Released in United States 2008 (Shown at Seattle International Film Festival (Documentary Competition/Documentary Films) May 22-June 15, 2008.)

Released in United States January 2008 (Shown at Sundance Film Festival (World Cinema Documentary Competition) January 17-27, 2008.)

Released in United States February 2008 (Shown at Berlin International Film Festival (Panorama Dokumente) February 7-17, 2008.)

Released in United States June 2008 (Shown at Los Angeles Film Festival (Tribute, Anniversary, and Special Screenings) June 19-29, 2008.)

Released in United States June 2008 (Shown at San Francisco International Lesbian and Gay Film Festival (Showcase) June 19-29, 2008.)

Released in United States Summer June 9, 2008

Released in United States July 2008 (Shown at Outfest: Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Film Festival (Documentary Features) July 9-21, 2008.)

Released in United States on Video September 2, 2008