The Last Laugh
Brief Synopsis
The doorman at a luxury hotel faces the shame of being demoted in this classic silent, told with (almost) no title cards .
Cast & Crew
Read More
F. W. Murnau
Director
Emil Jannings
Maly Delschaft
Max Hiller
Karl Freund
Photography
Carl Mayer
Screenwriter
Film Details
Also Known As
Der letzte Mann, Last Laugh, The, Last Man, Letzte Mann
Genre
Drama
Foreign
Silent
Release Date
1924
Technical Specs
Duration
1h 30m
Sound
Silent
Color
Black and White
Theatrical Aspect Ratio
1.33 : 1
Synopsis
A proud doorman's humiliation after his demotion.
Director
F. W. Murnau
Director
Film Details
Also Known As
Der letzte Mann, Last Laugh, The, Last Man, Letzte Mann
Genre
Drama
Foreign
Silent
Release Date
1924
Technical Specs
Duration
1h 30m
Sound
Silent
Color
Black and White
Theatrical Aspect Ratio
1.33 : 1
Articles
The Last Laugh - Emil Jannings in F.W. Murnau's THE LAST LAUGH on DVD
Josef von Sternberg -- who directed Jannings' Russian émigré general reduced to eking out a living as a lowly Hollywood extra in The Last Command and his schoolmaster ruined by obsessive love for a cabaret floozy in The Blue Angel -- is amusingly acerbic about Jannings in his memoir. Von Sternberg describes how Jannings would warm up by trying to wring pathos from the makeup man as he prepared to immerse himself in each day's shooting. Not that it helped him. He walked on The Blue Angel set a star, and walked off eclipsed by an overnight sensation named Marlene Dietrich.
In The Last Laugh, filmed by F.W. Murnau, and famous for its virtual abandonment of title cards (the visuals are that eloquent!), there's an interesting tension between the clash of styles Murnau's expressionist modernity played against Jannings' melodramatic theatrcality from an earlier era. It's as if the film has one foot in one era, the other in another. Jannings lays on the pathos as the longtime doorman of a swanky Berlin hotel, demoted to washroom attendant when he gets too old to easily heft trunks from taxis and is caught taking one snooze too many alongside the concierge's desk. Not accidentally, the men's washroom that becomes his new stage is physically lower, not just socially, one flight down from the lobby of the smart Atlantic Hotel.
How closely his identity is tied to his job eerily persistent theme! is expressed by his shame at having to return to his grubby apartment in a working-class neighborhood, reduced in status. He begins the film bursting with an almost pompous pride and complacency portly in build, eyes aglow in his mutton-chopped visage, encased in an intentionally exaggerated greatcoat. Long, thick, festooned with brass buttons and gold braid, topped by a visored hat, parodying the look of a military hero, it's a character in the film, too. It covers him like a carapace of reassurance, an embrace by the power structure. Without it, he feels naked, once-proud military gait replaced by a dazed shuffle. Small wonder he had worn it to and from work, enjoying the incongruity between his home street and the garment. Totally out of place in his neighborhood, its implication of borrowed clout set him apart, and a notch above, his fellow proles.
Smarting under the jeers of the neighbors in his apartment building, stripped of job and coat, he desperately attempts to sneak back to the hotel at night and steal the coat back, as if that will restore his damaged status. He does, it doesn't. But the film veers improbably into an upbeat ending ordered by the producer that Murnau all but openly mocks, no less than Brecht did when rescuing Macheath from the gallows with a pardon in The Threepenny Opera. This time, the pardon comes not from the king of England, but from a modern king, a capitalist, who becomes the means for the doorman turned doormat to ascend into the ranks of the plutocracy, treated as royalty at the hotel that employed him, lighting a zeppilin of a cigar, soaking up the fawning of his former boss. Thus Jannings' factotum comes full circle. He begins and ends exuberant, extroverted, a man buoyed by the belief that his place in the world is secured sandwiched around an incident of calamity during much of which Jannings resorts to an old actor's trick, being photographed from the rear, using his slumped back to convey a dejection that borders on implosion.
It's a frankly old-fashioned characterization, as big in its behaviors, expressions and gestures as Jannings himself was ample in girth. His doorman seems almost oblivious at being ushered into a new visual world for which Murnau was one of the standard-bearers. His contrast between the almost deco luxe of the grand hotel, and the crumbling shabbiness of the doorman's neighborhood, seems bounded, stylistically, by the skewed streets of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919) on the one hand and the sleek visuals of a Berlin knocking at the door of modernity in Berlin: Symphony of a Great City (1928). Karl Freund, Murnau's cameraman (he also photographed Symphony of a Great City), brilliantly anticipates a lot of the nocturnal angularity with which he was to enrich so many Hollywood films. Just who has The Last Laugh in "The Last Laugh" isn't clear. Probably not the doorman, as blind to being a pawn at the end as in the beginning. Probably Murnau and Freund. Still, there are several reasons it has become a film school staple, and they're readily apparent here.
Kino, taking the view that it's all about options, gives us, in exemplary fashion, a crisp 2003 restoration of the 1924 German original, the unrestored export version and a 40-minute making-of documentary. Two soundtracks, too, including a new performance of the original 1924 score by Giuseppe Becce. It seems an uneasy amalgam of Rimsky-Korsakoff's Scheherezade on the one hand and a lot of Wagner Lite on the other. But if the music seems a dated curio rather than an integral part of an esthetic whole, it never seriously gets in the way of the film's still-stunning visual style and the oblivious threshings about of Jannings' gored then restored ox.
For more information about The Last Laugh, visit Kino International.To order The Last Laugh, go to TCM Shopping.
by Jay Carr
The Last Laugh - Emil Jannings in F.W. Murnau's THE LAST LAUGH on DVD
All but forgotten today, Swiss-born Emil Jannings (1884-1950) was a giant of German
cinema who briefly enjoyed stardom in pre-talkie Hollywood. In 1928, he became the first
actor to win an Oscar, for The Last Command (1927) and The Way of All Flesh
(1927). But there was no room for his thick German accent in Hollywood talkies. What
might have been the rest of his career was self-aborted by his embrace of Naziism and
Goebbels' propaganda films. Today he's remembered for The Blue Angel (1930),
The Last Command and The Last Laugh (1924). In all, he lays a claim to being
film's High Priest of Suffering. In each, he depicts a man stripped of rank, station and
the respect that goes with both.
Josef von Sternberg -- who directed Jannings' Russian émigré general reduced to eking out
a living as a lowly Hollywood extra in The Last Command and his schoolmaster ruined by
obsessive love for a cabaret floozy in The Blue Angel -- is amusingly acerbic about
Jannings in his memoir. Von Sternberg describes how Jannings would warm up by trying to
wring pathos from the makeup man as he prepared to immerse himself in each day's
shooting. Not that it helped him. He walked on The Blue Angel set a star, and
walked off eclipsed by an overnight sensation named Marlene Dietrich.
In The Last Laugh, filmed by F.W. Murnau, and famous for its virtual abandonment
of title cards (the visuals are that eloquent!), there's an interesting tension between
the clash of styles Murnau's expressionist modernity played against Jannings'
melodramatic theatrcality from an earlier era. It's as if the film has one foot in one
era, the other in another. Jannings lays on the pathos as the longtime doorman of a
swanky Berlin hotel, demoted to washroom attendant when he gets too old to easily heft
trunks from taxis and is caught taking one snooze too many alongside the concierge's
desk. Not accidentally, the men's washroom that becomes his new stage is physically
lower, not just socially, one flight down from the lobby of the smart Atlantic
Hotel.
How closely his identity is tied to his job eerily persistent theme! is expressed by
his shame at having to return to his grubby apartment in a working-class neighborhood,
reduced in status. He begins the film bursting with an almost pompous pride and
complacency portly in build, eyes aglow in his mutton-chopped visage, encased in an
intentionally exaggerated greatcoat. Long, thick, festooned with brass buttons and gold
braid, topped by a visored hat, parodying the look of a military hero, it's a character
in the film, too. It covers him like a carapace of reassurance, an embrace by the power
structure. Without it, he feels naked, once-proud military gait replaced by a dazed
shuffle. Small wonder he had worn it to and from work, enjoying the incongruity between
his home street and the garment. Totally out of place in his neighborhood, its
implication of borrowed clout set him apart, and a notch above, his fellow proles.
Smarting under the jeers of the neighbors in his apartment building, stripped of job and
coat, he desperately attempts to sneak back to the hotel at night and steal the coat
back, as if that will restore his damaged status. He does, it doesn't. But the film veers
improbably into an upbeat ending ordered by the producer that Murnau all but openly
mocks, no less than Brecht did when rescuing Macheath from the gallows with a pardon in
The Threepenny Opera. This time, the pardon comes not from the king of England,
but from a modern king, a capitalist, who becomes the means for the doorman turned
doormat to ascend into the ranks of the plutocracy, treated as royalty at the hotel that
employed him, lighting a zeppilin of a cigar, soaking up the fawning of his former boss.
Thus Jannings' factotum comes full circle. He begins and ends exuberant, extroverted, a
man buoyed by the belief that his place in the world is secured sandwiched around an
incident of calamity during much of which Jannings resorts to an old actor's trick, being
photographed from the rear, using his slumped back to convey a dejection that borders on
implosion.
It's a frankly old-fashioned characterization, as big in its behaviors, expressions and
gestures as Jannings himself was ample in girth. His doorman seems almost oblivious at
being ushered into a new visual world for which Murnau was one of the standard-bearers.
His contrast between the almost deco luxe of the grand hotel, and the crumbling
shabbiness of the doorman's neighborhood, seems bounded, stylistically, by the skewed
streets of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919) on the one hand and the sleek
visuals of a Berlin knocking at the door of modernity in Berlin: Symphony of a Great
City (1928). Karl Freund, Murnau's cameraman (he also photographed Symphony of a
Great City), brilliantly anticipates a lot of the nocturnal angularity with which he
was to enrich so many Hollywood films. Just who has The Last Laugh in "The Last
Laugh" isn't clear. Probably not the doorman, as blind to being a pawn at the end as
in the beginning. Probably Murnau and Freund. Still, there are several reasons it has
become a film school staple, and they're readily apparent here.
Kino, taking the view that it's all about options, gives us, in exemplary fashion, a
crisp 2003 restoration of the 1924 German original, the unrestored export version and a
40-minute making-of documentary. Two soundtracks, too, including a new performance of the
original 1924 score by Giuseppe Becce. It seems an uneasy amalgam of Rimsky-Korsakoff's
Scheherezade on the one hand and a lot of Wagner Lite on the other. But if the music
seems a dated curio rather than an integral part of an esthetic whole, it never seriously
gets in the way of the film's still-stunning visual style and the oblivious threshings
about of Jannings' gored then restored ox.
For more information about The Last Laugh, visit Kino
International.To order The Last Laugh, go to
TCM Shopping.
by Jay Carr
Quotes
Trivia
Writer Carl Mayer originally did not want to have a happy ending. There is a rumour that he was forced to do so by the production company, and the ironic text before the epilog saying that the writer had sympathy for the old doorman was his way of getting back.
The film uses no title cards.
Miscellaneous Notes
Released in United States 1924
Released in United States 1924